July 10, 2020
Dear Father Peter and Members of the Board of Trustees of ֱ University,
We know these are difficult times for you as our university leadership. However, we are compelled by our consciences to ask you to address our concerns. The Second Vatican Council, upholding a long Christian tradition, held that all people “have a right to act according to the dictates of conscience” (Gaudium et spes, 26). In our University founded on Catholic and Augustinian principles, we are exercising that right.
The following words from the ֱ University’s Faculty/Staff “CARITAS Commitment” prompt us to write to you:
As members of a community that upholds the Augustinian Catholic values of Veritas, Unitas, Caritas (Truth, Unity, Love), each of us must pledge to do our part to help keep all of us healthy and safe. This shared responsibility—to be considerate of others and capable of complying with health and safety requirements—is at the heart of the CARITAS Commitment.
In taking the Commitment to heart, we ֱ faculty (an independent group, with members from across the campus) have serious concerns, both medical and ethical, about its particular applications to the Fall 2020 Plan and about the process leading to the prioritization of on-campus instruction and housing. In our judgment, a “responsibility to the community” means more than following masking, distancing, and cleaning protocols. It includes not only (a) care for the entire community (all types of students, all types of staff, all types of faculty) but also (b) a clear awareness of the current situation in which the community lives—one of persistent and growing danger, and rising numbers of COVID-19 cases, and (c) concern for the members of other communities (including family members, friends, and those in our geographical region) with whom ֱns interact.
At its root, the CARITAS Commitment is about exercising justice both within the ֱ community and toward those with whom our community interacts. Social, racial, and economic justice are integral elements of caritas. While a handful of faculty have been a part of the process, not everyone has had a real voice in the formation of the University’s policies for reopening and our voices have often been sought after major decisions have been made. For our part, we agree with the growing chorus of epidemiologists who warn that no university can safely reopen without accepting that some students, faculty and staff will become seriously ill and die (see, for example, https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/06/30/there-is-nosafe-way-reopen-colleges-this-fall/). The latest research, which warns that airborne transmission of the coronavirus may be even a greater threat in indoor spaces than previously assumed (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/06/health/coronavirus-airborne-aerosols.html), indicates that health and safety issues are a moving target and that University policies need to keep up with the latest research. Repeating that the CDC does not recommend mass testing, while many other universities (including Georgetown, Cornell, Penn, and Haverford College) are adopting robust testing regimens, does not suffice. We are dismayed that experts on campus from the Biology Department and Nursing School have not been thoroughly involved in designing aspects of the reopening plan that pertain to testing, tracing and quarantining of students, and health and safety more generally.
ֱ’s policies also need to address, beyond some vague mentions of risk, the persistent and unpredictable physiological and neurological damage already seen in COVID-19 sufferers, not only for people in “high risk” categories. In addition, the fact that Black, Latinx and indigenous people, including young adults, are more than five times more likely to die from COVID-19 needs to be considered more fully when asking, or even requiring students, faculty, and staff from these groups to return to campus.
Given these facts, we believe reopening campus robustly imposes unacceptable risks on students, staff, faculty, and the surrounding community, which may likely experience a public health crisis should our campus become a COVID-19 “hotspot.” Along with decisions already made by universities such as University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Rutgers, Princeton, Harvard, Yale, and the California State University System, we believe that ֱ should offer the vast majority of its courses online, perhaps allowing a severely restricted number of courses on campus that require hands-on learning (for example, in science, nursing, engineering). We believe this approach is best for the common good of ֱns and the larger community. Regardless of whether you can or cannot agree to such a decision, we ask that:
• All students be allowed to choose to learn online if they deem it best for their safety, without having to go through LSS and submit sensitive, private health information
(students have circulated a petition with this same request);
• ֱ test students who decide to return to campus for COVID-19 pre- and postarrival in order to establish a baseline of risk within the community, and then test randomly throughout the semester;
• The needs of our most vulnerable students be prioritized, which demands supplying them with access to high-speed internet if necessary, housing for students in challenging situations who need a safe place, and consistently available counseling services;
• All faculty be empowered to do what their consciences dictate for their own health, the health of their families, and health of the community, both at ֱ and beyond. Faculty should determine the pedagogy and mode of instructional delivery (online, hybrid or in-person) that they believe is best for our students during this stressful time. They should be permitted to make this decision without having to submit documents to human resources with reasons for their choices, medical or otherwise (many faculty asked for this via Faculty Congress). While we appreciate the efforts of chairs and deans to accommodate faculty as much as possible, there should simply be a universal policy;
• Telework for staff remain the norm for the foreseeable future, rather than the exception, in accord with PA DOE guidance that “where possible and feasible, personnel should be allowed to telework”;
• All employees who are essential to campus operations, especially those in precarious situations, be afforded paid sick leave, free on-site COVID-19 testing, workers’ compensation should they become ill, PPE (including N95 face masks, shields and gloves, and plexiglass barriers whenever possible), and ability to take time off and not be asked to work overtime if they do not want to;
• No layoffs of staff or faculty be enacted, but instead the University should increase the payout from the endowment, use part of unrestricted net assets to support operations, redirect funds from the athletic to the academic budget, postpone all non-essential capital projects spending, and ask university leaders to take further cuts proportional to their salary and benefits.
We know that ֱ faces an unprecedented situation, and that every decision or plan enacted will have some form of adverse consequences. We ask that your decisions first and foremost be guided by the imperative to protect and preserve the health and sanctity of all human life and caritas above financial costs (for as St. John Paul II wrote, “the sacredness of life gives rise to its inviolability”). Please consider as well the reputational damage to ֱ if and when people become sick and die. We also ask you to remember that every decision has pedagogical and ethical import: the decisions taken at this critical juncture will teach our students whether we believe that being on campus, which is certainly something to be cherished, is more important than risking the health and lives of those who will inevitably become infected by COVID-19, a stark reality that the CARITAS Commitment itself, as well as members of the
administration, have all acknowledged.
Sincerely,
Prof. Theodore Arapis
Department of Public Administration
Prof. Gerald J. Beyer
Department of Theology and Religious Studies
Prof. Timothy M. Brunk
Department of Theology and Religious Studies
Prof. Q Chung
Department of Accounting and Information Systems
Prof. Jerusha Conner
Department of Education and Counseling
Prof. Rick Eckstein
Department of Sociology and Criminology
Prof. Massimo Faggioli
Department of Theology and Religious Studies
Prof. Anthony J. Godzieba
Department of Theology and Religious Studies
Prof. Robert Jantzen
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Prof. Maghan Keita
Departments of History and Global Interdisciplinary Studies
Prof. Michael Levitan
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Prof. Jill McCorkel
Department of Sociology and Criminology
Prof. Barbara Romaine
Department of Global Interdisciplinary Studies
Prof. Catherine Warrick
Department of Political Science
Director, Center for Arab and Islamic Studies